Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Project Description

Revise the content, organization, and navigation of the website to support the requirements of internal and external users. Our objectives:

  • Understand users’ relationship to Licensed Resources.
  • Understand the use cases that bring users to the Licensed Resources webpages.
  • Understand how users approach, access, and navigate the Licensed Resources webpages.
  • Identify aspects of the LR webpages that present challenges to users.

In-Scope Web Properties

http://www.cdlib.org/services/collections/licensed/ 

Project Team 

Project Contact: Jacqueline Wilson

User Experience: Rachael Hu

Content Strategy: Alana Miller

Web Production: N/A

 

Documents/Links

 

UX Handshake Doc

User Assessment Script

User Assessment Planning Notes

User Assessment Interview Contacts

Content Review Based on User Assessment Findings


Action Items

    •  

      Initial user and content author assessment

      •  

        Interviews with 4+ external users to understand how they use the LR pages, what their needs are, and what their expectations are

      •  

        Meet with LR content creators (Holly, Wendy, Adriana, Chan) to learn more about their sections and how they intend those sections to be used

      •  

        Compare findings from both of the above, and check against Google Analytics

      •  

        Map the licensed resources, acqusitions and cataloging workflow.

        •  

          Map pieces of web content identified by users as important to the workflow.

    •  

      LR and UX teams revise and create new content (estimated delivery 2/1)

    •  

      Create 2-3 new version of information architecture (IA) for LR section

      •  

        Draft 2-3 new IA arrangements using pages that were identified as Keep/Optimize during the content audit. This may include removing or consolidating pages, or making suggestions for new content or pages, such as the Tableau content.

      •  

        Review 2-3 IA drafts with internal stakeholders.

    •  

      Test versions of the website information architecture with user groups 

      •  

        Conduct a tree-test of current IA vs new versions of IA with a broader pool of IA users, including those we interviewed for the user assessment. 

        •  This includes the heirarchical organization of pages, as well as navigational labels.
      •  

        Review test results with with internal stakeholders. Determine if there is a clear winner among the new IAs, or if they need to be tweaked and then re-tested.

      •  Re-test second draft of IA(s) with user pool.
    •  

      Finalized new information architecture. Deliverables include:

      •  

        New sitemap for LR section

      •  

        Revised navigation scheme/labeling

      •  

        Wireframes/copy deck showing any new content (including: Tableau content; LR status chart page; etc.)

    •  

      Publish recommended changes to the website 

      •  

        Send wireframes to Craig

      •  

        Get staging version of website approved by Jackie & Ivy

      •  

        Publish!

Estimated Timeline

Minimum 13 weeks.

  • 4 weeks to recruit users for initial interviews; have meeting with Jackie, Rachael, Holly, Wendy, Adriana, Chan for identify intent for content sections; conduct interviews with users.

  • 3 weeks for revising IA; internal reviews of revised IA

  • 3 weeks for testing period (assuming it is a survey accessed via email or link on website, not a 1-on-1 user study); meantime Alana will work on identifying content to be updated

  • 2 weeks to incorporate test and internal feedback and finalize information architecture